Minnesota

Big Ten · fbs
4-26 games playedHistory ▸

next vs Iowa 28%

MPR
-0.1
#76
Resume
-7.5
#76
Offense
-0.8
#88
Defense
0.9
#58
SOS
-5.9
#81
Luck
+0.30
wins vs expected

6 critical stats

Conversion downs
40.4%
36/89 on 3rd & 4th
Available yards
45.6%
1,687 of 3,702 (no garbage)
Opportunity %
37.5%
63/168 rushes 4+ yds
Field position
+11.2
own 35.5 avg start
Points / scoring trip
5.17
124 pts on 24 drives that reached our 40
Def. explosives
10.0%
34 allowed on 341 scrimmage plays (12+ rush / 19+ pass)

Luck — what didn’t repeat

Wins vs expected+0.30box score, game by game — 5 replayed games
Turnover luck-0.19+0.00 on fumbles recovered, -0.19 on interceptions

Both are results that outran the plays behind them, so both tend to come back to zero: each sums to ~0 across FBS, and a team at the top of one list this season is usually near the middle of it next season (year-over-year r ≈ −0.18 for both). A positive number is not a knock on the team and a negative one is not a promise — it is the part of the record that did not come from anything repeatable.

What explains this team

6 games played · all of them counted — FCS opponents fold into one baseline opponent
Strengths
Field positionexpected pts from drive startoff 97 pct · def 93 pctnet+1.44
OFF
+1.01
DEF
+0.43
Behind-LOS (TFL+sacks)per scrimmage playoff 55 pct · def 94 pctnet+0.40
OFF
+0.01
DEF
+0.39
Turnover-equivalentsgiveaways + 4th-down stops + 20-yd PRs allowedoff 76 pct · def 33 pctnet+0.19
OFF
+0.55
DEF
-0.36
Success rate50% / 70% / all of it, by downoff 42 pct · def 68 pctnet+0.10
OFF
-0.15
DEF
+0.25
3rd-down conversionconversionoff 49 pct · def 65 pctnet+0.04
OFF
-0.09
DEF
+0.13
Holding them back
Trips inside the 40points per tripoff 26 pct · def 18 pctnet-1.08
OFF
-0.40
DEF
-0.68
Run line blockingOL yards per carryoff 1 pct · def 47 pctnet-0.38
OFF
-0.33
DEF
-0.05
Explosive plays12+ yd rush / 19+ yd passoff 22 pct · def 59 pctnet-0.26
OFF
-0.35
DEF
+0.09
Early-down YPPdowns 1-2 yards/playoff 22 pct · def 75 pctnet-0.19
OFF
-0.47
DEF
+0.28
Yards per playraw efficiencyoff 24 pct · def 75 pctnet-0.16
OFF
-0.58
DEF
+0.42
Each side is measured from zero — right is a strength, left a drag; the right column is the net of the two.

Each value is the team's deviation from the league average on that factor × the factor's fitted weight, in points of the model's projected margin. Both sides are oriented the same way: positive = better than league average at that factor. The "pct" figure is the raw opponent-adjusted standing in the season, so a factor the model gives little independent weight to (the per-play efficiency stats overlap heavily) shows its true rank instead of a bare 0.00. The ten nets add to the Offense and Defense chips, which decompose the projected margin — not the MPR.

Schedule & results

Loading…

Record odds — odds of each record at each point of the season

Loading…

First column: the selected model's win probability for that game. Every following column: the chance you have exactly that many wins after that game (regular season, workbook methodology — Φ(margin / 17)). Actuals mode pins played games to their real result and projects the rest of the season with the selected model.

Loading…

Situational splits

Loading…